"Super RIGI": the government conceded a 20% local-supplier quota, allies blocked the committee report anyway, and they are now demanding price preference for Argentine firms — still not law
This tracker recorded on 26 August that the "Super RIGI" — a regime running parallel to the RIGI already in force, with a USD 1 billion investment floor for "new industries" — was stalled in the Senate because allied blocs were conditioning their signatures on changes the government refused to accept. What changed since: the government gave way. To unblock the committee report, expected on 2 September, La Libertad Avanza accepted two specific amendments demanded by the UCR, the PRO and the provinces. The first is a local-content quota: every project joining the regime must submit a local supplier development plan committing to contract goods, services and/or works worth at least 20% of the investment allocated to supplier payments — with the clarification the allies asked for, that the 20% covers goods actually produced in the country (civil works and services inevitably rendered locally do not count). The second, more specific and more relevant to this tracker's readers, targets projects with very high electricity demand — every source cites AI data centres as the example: they will have to provide their own generation or electrical infrastructure (the most precise wording refers to building their own substations) where their demand could affect the energy supply of the province or municipality hosting them. Neither of these is law yet, and what followed confirms it. UPDATE OF 7 SEPTEMBER: the 2 September session did NOT sign the report. Accepting the two changes was not enough — the UCR, the PRO and dissident Peronism demanded a third amendment and La Libertad Avanza adjourned for lack of signatures. What they are asking for now bites harder than the 20% quota and hits any foreign supplier directly: an article establishing that where the price gap between an Argentine company's bid and a foreign firm's is up to 15%, the Argentine company gets priority. Mid-debate, Patricia Bullrich argued that "if the Super RIGI is this much trouble, we keep the RIGI we have". As of 7 September there is no signed report; the floor vote had been projected for 10 September and now depends on those signatures appearing. One more thing that calibrates the timeline: because the Senate is amending a text already passed by the Deputies, if it is approved this way it goes back to the lower house for a second reading — a Senate vote alone would not make it law.
- Legal instrument
- Bill passed by the Chamber of Deputies on 24 June 2026. On 2 September, in a joint session of the Budget, National Economy and Investment, and General Legislation committees, the ruling bloc agreed to two amendments requested by allied blocs (UCR, PRO) and by the provinces in order to unblock the committee report. STILL NOT LAW: this is a text under parliamentary negotiation, not a rule in force
- Authority
- National Congress — bill creating an Incentive Regime for Large Investments in New Industries. Updates the entry this tracker recorded on 26 August 2026 (passed by the lower house, report stalled in the Senate)
- Status
- Bill in Congress
- Last verified
- 2026-09-07
What changes
- The ruling bloc accepted two amendments it had been rejecting as recently as 19 August, in order to unblock the committee report in the Senate
- Change 1 — local content: a local supplier development plan committing to contract at least 20% of the investment allocated to supplier payments, in goods, services and/or works; the allies asked to clarify that the 20% covers goods actually produced in the country, excluding civil works
- Change 2 — own generation for intensive consumers: high-electricity-demand projects (sources cite AI data centres) will have to provide their own generation or electrical infrastructure (building their own substations) where demand could affect provincial or municipal energy supply. The exact wording of this point was not final when this entry was verified — two sources agree on the obligation but not on the final drafting
- The rest of the bill is unchanged from what was recorded on 26 August: USD 1 billion investment floor, 30 years of tax, customs and FX stability, and a regime parallel to the RIGI already in force rather than a replacement for it
- Actual status as of 7 September 2026: the 2 September session did NOT sign the report and adjourned for lack of signatures. Accepting the two changes was not enough. The floor vote was projected for 10 September, subject to a report existing
- Change 3, demanded by the allies and NOT yet accepted: a price-preference article — where the price gap between an Argentine bid and a foreign one is up to 15%, the Argentine company is preferred. This is the demand that blocked the signature on 2 September, and the point that would most change the equation for a foreign supplier
- Because the Senate is amending a text already passed by the Deputies, approval in this form sends the bill back for a second reading: final enactment, if it happens, will not come before that round trip
- Still not law. There is no tax, customs or FX benefit that can be invoked under this regime yet
What it opens
The USD 1 billion entry threshold keeps this out of reach for most readers of this tracker as something directly applicable. But for the smaller universe genuinely weighing a project at that scale — digital infrastructure and large-scale compute in particular — the actionable point today is not the tax benefit, which still cannot be invoked, but the direction of the text. Two costs that were not in the original bill are being negotiated into it right now, and a third one, the 15% price preference, would reach further than the other two: it does not affect only the investor, it affects who that investor is allowed to contract. If you supply into projects of this kind from abroad, that clause is the one to watch this month.
Who it applies to: developers of large-scale digital infrastructure and data centres, energy-intensive industrial projects, and foreign suppliers bidding into projects of this size
Sources
- Minuto de Cierre — Súper RIGI: la UCR, el PRO y aliados frenaron el dictamen en el Senado y se demora su tratamiento (2/9/2026, 18:44 — cita textual del artículo de preferencia de precio del 15%) ↗
- Ushuaia Noticias — El Senado frenó el dictamen del Súper RIGI (3/9/2026) ↗
- Parlamentario — Con modificaciones, el Senado va por el dictamen del Súper RIGI (1/9/2026, detalle de los dos cambios acordados y cronograma) ↗
- Infobae — Senado: el Súper RIGI tendría cambios y podría regresar a Diputados tras una negociación entre libertarios y radicales (2/9/2026) ↗
- ADNSUR — El Senado busca el dictamen del Súper RIGI: plenario de comisiones, cambios y el plan de sesión del 10 de septiembre (2/9/2026, 06:30) ↗
- Tiempo Argentino — Se dictamina con modificaciones el 'Súper Rigi' en el Senado y volvería a Diputados (1/9/2026) ↗
- Cámara de Diputados de la Nación (oficial) — Diputados le dio media sanción al 'Súper RIGI' que incentiva grandes inversiones en nuevas industrias (antecedente, 24/6/2026) ↗
Sources are primary wherever available — the Official Gazette, the issuing authority, or the text of the rule itself. This is information, not legal advice.
También disponible en español: ver esta medida en español
Full guideArgentina RIGI (2026): 30-Year Incentives, USD 200M Threshold & the July 2027 Deadline (Decreto 105/2026)Read it in the Journal →Is this window yours?
inteligenciar.com helps companies land, operate and export from Argentina — entity, banking, accounting and hiring, with one point of contact.
Get in touch →