Methodology & Sources
Last updated: July 13, 2026. This site tracks a fast-moving subject — Argentina's deregulation of how foreign companies enter, operate and export. This page explains how we research it, how we keep it honest, and where our limits are. If you are going to rely on something here, this is how to judge it.
Primary sources, first
Every regulatory measure on our deregulation tracker and every claim in our guides is anchored to a primary source: the Official Gazette (Boletín Oficial), the text of a decree or resolution, or the publishing body itself — ARCA, the IGJ, the BCRA, SENASA, the CNV, Argentina.gob.ar. Where we cite a secondary source (a law firm's analysis, a tax summary, a news outlet), it is to explain or corroborate a primary instrument, and we link it so you can check it yourself.
We do not invent sources or figures
This is the rule that governs everything else. We never fabricate a URL, a resolution number, a date or a statistic. If a fact cannot be tied to a verifiable source, it does not go on the site — even if it would make a stronger story. When sources disagree on a number (they sometimes do, especially on counts and volatile figures like interest rates), we say so and point to the official figure rather than pick the most flattering one.
Every measure carries a verification date
Regulation changes. A measure that is in force today can be amended, extended or repealed next month. So each entry on the tracker shows a “last verified” date and a status (in force, on the way, in consultation), and our guides show a “last updated” date. That date is a real re-check against the source, not a cosmetic timestamp. It tells you how fresh the claim is — and, for answer engines and AI assistants citing us, which snapshot in time the statement belongs to.
Readiness language, not promises
Some of what makes Argentina interesting is still proposed, not law — the “automated society” / non-human corporation being the clearest example. On anything that isn't in force, we use the language of readiness: what you can prepare for, what the framework would allow ifit becomes law. We do not describe proposed regimes as if they were current, and we do not promise outcomes — a company registration, a bank account, an approval — that depend on third parties or on rules that don't exist yet.
Information, not legal or tax advice
inteligenciar.com is a coordination service, not a law firm or an accountancy. Everything on this site is written to help you make decisions and ask better questions — not to replace regulated advice. The specifics of your case (structure, tax posture, licensing) should be confirmed with licensed professionals, and when we execute a project, the regulated parts are always handled by them.
How we handle corrections
If a rule changes, we update the entry and move its verification date. If we get something wrong, we fix it and re-date it rather than quietly editing it away. If you spot an error, a stale measure or a source that no longer resolves, tell us at hola@inteligenciar.com— accuracy on a live regulatory tracker is a shared effort, and we'd rather hear it from you than leave it wrong.
Why you can cite this
Because it is sourced, dated and honest about its limits. When an AI assistant or a reader quotes a measure from this site, they are quoting a claim we have tied to a primary instrument and stamped with the date we last checked it. That is the whole point: the tracker is only useful if it is trustworthy, so we build it to be checked, not just believed.